Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Wendy Melvoin: Playing for the Revolution

https://www.premierguitar.com/artists/wendy-melvoin-playing-for-the-revolution

Prince’s former guitarist discusses the Revolution’s legacy and recent tour—and what it was like to write and trade licks with the High Priest of Pop.

The fire and magic that happens when a charismatic frontperson and a gifted musical foil find symbiosis is truly beguiling. Elvis had Scotty Moore, Bowie had Mick Ronson, and for a few charmed, arguably career-defining years, Prince had Wendy Melvoin.

Melvoin has come a long way since her days sparring with the late icon. She started playing guitar with Prince’s band in 1983, and was a permanent fixture and cowriter on the Revolution’s three seminal albums: Purple Rain (1984), Around the World in a Day (1985), and Parade (1986). After Prince disbanded the Revolution in 1986, Melvoin went on to enjoy success fronting her own pop group, Wendy & Lisa, with keyboardist, Revolution alum, and lifelong musical partner, Lisa Coleman. The Los Angeles-born Melvoin has since morphed into a perpetually in-demand session player, songwriter, producer, and composer, with a resume that reaches far and wide into disparate spheres of the music and film worlds, and includes the likes of John Legend, Seal, Grace Jones, Glen Campbell, Sheryl Crow, and Joni Mitchell.

While Melvoin—the daughter of the legendary Wrecking Crew pianist Mike Melvoin—undoubtedly possessed impressive skills as a rhythm guitarist and hooksmith when she initially caught Prince’s attention at the green age of 19, she makes no bones about the impact her time with the innovative Master from Minneapolis had upon her development as a musician and composer. In fact, she refers to that period of her career as her “Juilliard or Harvard years.” And for anyone who’s taken the time to gaze beyond the mystical purple glare and truly analyze Prince’s Revolution-era output, Melvoin’s contributions as a texture player and rhythm ace should be immediately apparent, particularly on the magnum opus that is Purple Rain, which put forth a cadre of unforgettable singles that all featured heavy doses of Melvoin’s guitar and vocals.

While the band unfortunately never made good on the perennial reunion tour rumors that circled about through the years, Prince’s tragic passing prompted the group to reunite and put together a tour as a means to both grieve the loss of their friend and leader, and to celebrate the tremendous music they forged in his keep.

Melvoin took the time to catch up with Premier Guitar between Revolution tour dates and reflected on her time working and learning with Prince, the craft of pop guitar work, and the healing process that’s come with this tour.

Was it challenging to relearn these tunes after all the time that’s passed, and was there a lot of adjustment required to play parts that weren’t originally yours?

You know, it was really an interesting process just trying to just figure out the best way to be respectful of the material and do justice to those parts that weren’t originally mine, but without being a showboat, which is something I just absolutely have no interest in being. Prince’s soloing was super impassioned, and, of course, he did a lot of calisthenics, but when he would reach for those wild high notes, that was really like an extension of his voice or singing. So that’s kind of where I wanted to be, honoring that side of his playing. I didn’t want to be “the fast machine”—I’m not interested in the athletics, honestly.

When it comes to playing the parts I had been playing, I’m an infinitely better player than I was when I was 19. I’ve been playing for 40 years now, so I’m just a better player and that meant the task at hand itself wasn’t hard, but the emotional aspect and approach to playing those songs was something I really wanted to be mindful of.

As far as calisthenics go, I always felt Prince was one of those rare athletic players who was extremely dexterous, but always made every note count for something. Even when he was playing something tricky, it wasn’t banal.

Yes, it’s true! Sometimes he had moments where I’d look over and he’d be going for it and I’d laugh to myself and say, “You don’t even know what you’re doing right now!” But by the time he passed, he was undoubtedly a true master at the neck of the guitar. He just knew the thing so damn well.

What’s the most important thing you learned from working with Prince as a guitarist and a composer?

Space. Learning the definition, in Prince’s world, of what “space” really meant between five people on a stage, and the discipline it takes to not stray from script in terms of what you’re playing. Don’t start having a musical dialogue with solos, or throwing new notes in where they aren’t expected, when you’re supposed to be doing justice to a song as it was intended.

Our accepted ... even honored job, was to give him the space to be the musician he wanted to be onstage. When it came time to do things in the studio, it was a different experience, and there was a lot of give and take with that because he relied on creative ideas coming from me. But as a side guy onstage, I was there to help him be the best he could be.

I always considered Prince to be the greatest black hat chef on the planet, but he has to have the best team in that room to support him, or that meal’s going to turn out like shit. I really believe that and he just built a great team, particularly with the Revolution. I think we all walked away with an incredible amount of discipline; those were my Harvard or Juilliard years, so to speak. It definitely translated into my work ethic. I have an extremely high work ethic to this day and I work every day on my composition skills and getting better at my instrument, and that came directly from those years of strict discipline—of listening, learning, and understanding what the dialogue was between the musicians onstage and how to best function within Prince’s world.

Could you describe the chemistry you had with Prince as his guitar foil?

Well, the thing he liked about me was that I never considered myself a female guitar player—I was simply a guitar player. He really respected that about me, but at the same time, if you look at things like “Computer Blue,” where I was getting on my knees and we did something similar in the onstage theatrics to Ronson and Bowie’s interaction, there was an obvious gender definition happening, but what turned it on its head is that we were very fluid in our gender roles onstage. But I never really considered myself the “chick” guitar player. I know everyone else did, but I didn’t, and so I didn’t define myself that way at all. I relied upon my playing to define myself, and that was something he picked up on.

As a player, I was able to communicate with Prince very well. I knew exactly how he worked as a guitarist—particularly that right hand of his. I knew what he wanted to hear, and I took tremendous pride in being able to sound like a part of him while still sounding like myself. The real magic, to my ears, happened when the mixture of my playing, Prince’s lead guitar, and Lisa Coleman’s keyboards jelled. It was like another language or Shakti, as far as I’m concerned. We wouldn’t have to do much verbal communication at all because the initial seed that came out of us worked so well in that environment. We had a great musical connection. It wasn’t natural, because each one of us had our own singular talents that we brought to the table, and we had to work on it, but it was unreal when it happened. Prince himself could play just about anything, though. However, he never could play like Lisa; that’s the one musician throughout his entire career that he could never play like. She has her own singular thing that even he couldn’t cop, which is a serious distinction.

I, on the other hand, was sort of the great facilitator. I could morph between styles and sounds easily. That’s why I ended up being a sought-after studio musician for such a wide variety of records and musicians. I’ve done everything from Los Lobos to Joni Mitchell to Madonna, etc. But I think my strength is morphing, and that kind of thing worked really well with Prince and I and our musical dialogue. We had the same influences, too, although he was a big Carlos Santana fan and I was not! I was a John McLaughlin fan, though they did do a great record together.

As an insider who undoubtedly saw more of Prince as a guitarist than many, was there anything you found extraordinary about his playing that might not be immediately obvious to an outsider?

If you want to see the real magic in Prince’s playing, it’s not his left hand; his picking hand was everything. You’ve got the blues dudes that use their thumb and finger, or the Albert King dudes that use their fingers to really pluck the hell out of the strings and muscle it, but Prince, when he played rhythm, could go from picking to seamlessly hiding that pick between two fingers and doing this form of almost bass slapping that would bring out these funk parts in a way that sounded like double-speed guitar, and it would always blow my mind. He was really great at that, and rhythm work in general.

He was also just so great at writing a guitar hook. He knew how to craft a guitar hook that would do exactly what was needed.

You’ve always displayed a real gift for weaving together incredibly funky guitar rhythms. Do you have a philosophy to penning those parts?

I don’t really have a philosophy, but it’s just what naturally comes out of me. I can tone it down if need be, but a lot of the time, it’ll be what’s asked of me when I go into a session. I played on a John Legend record last year that Blake Mills was producing—who, by the way, I think is the best up-and-coming guitarist I’ve ever heard—but we sat in a room together and had a musical dialogue, where we played back and forth off of each other on this one track. Because Blake would go more avant-garde with his rhythm playing, I tried to go for the more old-school, straight-ahead Telecaster through the board thing, with a compressed kind of sound, because it made for a great contrast to what Blake was doing. So if there’s an overarching philosophy Ido have, it’s in providing contrast and jelling.

On the other hand, I did a Neil Finn record a few years ago where I played every style imaginable on guitar and bass and it just happened to work really well for his songwriting. The playing I did was focused on putting weird little twists on his songwriting, which happens to be some of the best I’ve ever heard. But my goal on that record was to help his music sway a little more, instead of just being so straightforward. It’s about serving the song and the task at hand.

The main guitar riff on “Computer Blue” is one of my favorites from the whole Prince discography. Could you detail your involvement in the writing of that tune, and also tell us how that doubled-lead lick in the middle that you two play came into being?

Well, the main hook at the beginning, that’s mine. Lisa and I were at rehearsal at a warehouse space and demoing music that would all wind up being Purple Rain stuff, and Prince walked in on that day and it was something that piqued his interest, so “Computer Blue” was based on that hook. We all worked on it together from there.

The triplet guitar solo part is, interestingly enough, my albatross! Every musician has their muscle memory and that lick is just Prince’s on perfect display. It was a part that he played so naturally. My muscle memory just doesn’t have the same freedom as his did, and that was just a part that came to him so easily. So, since I started playing that lick at age 19, to this day when I play it on my own, I’m not doing the part justice. However, I’ve learned to give myself a break on it because it’s just one of those things that my muscle memory won’t allow for. It’s been a real trip trying to study that particular pattern and why it was so effortless for him to play, but for me, I have to be incredibly mindful because my hands just don’t work that form the same way.

Do you recall the signal chain you used to get that giant sound on the main guitar hook on that song?

Sure do! For my guitar, it was a Boss compressor, probably a CS-1, directly into a TC Electronic distortion pedal, into an MXR boost, into a Cry Baby Wah, then my chorus, the brand of which escapes me right now, and then into a volume pedal, all of which fed into a Mesa/Boogie Mark II head on a cab with, I think, a pair of JBL speakers. I was using one of my modified purple Rickenbackers when we recorded it.

Those purple Rickenbackers are pretty iconic in their own right. What were the modifications?

They looked like a Ric, but they really weren’t after we got done with them. They were loaded with G&L pickups, and had the f-holes sealed up, so there was no air moving in them like a stock guitar. Some motherfucker stole them out of my rehearsal studio about 25 years ago. I’m on eBay every day and I’m looking in pawnshops all over the world for those guitars. It’s a massive bummer that they’re gone.

So one of Prince’s things is he wanted me to play big-bodied guitars. For whatever reason, he liked the idea of me holding a big guitar. He had me playing this huge Gibson SJ-200 acoustic and I just hated the thing. I’d be like, “The fucking thing is too big, man!” and he’d be like, “It’s great! You gotta play it! It looks great!” I hated it. I wanted my little Teles and my little Mustangs—that’s what I wanted and that’s what I play now! The only big-bodied guitars I still have and adore are my old 335s; that’s really what I stick to. But back then, he wanted me to play these big guitars.

So we got these Rics, but I didn’t want to sound like Roger McGuinn, so we modified them. This guy at Knut-Koupée Music in Minneapolis did work on Prince’s beautiful Hohner Telecaster and my own guitars. We talked about getting them painted for the Purple Rain tour and film, and installing those G&L pickups so they’d have more sustain, and just things that made sense for the stage setup we were using. We were playing with these massive side fills, like stadium shit, and I’ve actually lost hearing in one of my ears because of those side fills! The point is, I couldn’t have any feedback because of the proximity to those side fills, so we clogged up the guitars, and that’s what they became.

I’ve seen that white Gibson ES-335 in your hands more than any guitar over the course of your career. What’s the story on that one and what do you love about it so much?

Gibson came to rehearsal back in 1985 and presented me with that guitar before we left for the Parade tour. It’s been my jewel. I have a few other 335s from 1967 that are absolutely phenomenal, too, but the white one was made for me and I now play it consistently. I only play it with flatwounds and it’s just been a dream guitar. That guitar was used for the entire Parade tour and our last tour as a band. Actually, Prince called me about 6 months before he passed and goes, “God! Do you still have that white 335?” And indeed I do.

Were you using flatwound strings back in the day as well?

No, I just started using them in the past 10 years. I keep slinky rounds on certain guitars I use in the studio, but for the most part, I really like flats. They have a sound that’s just really great for me.

Looking back, do you have a proudest moment or contribution as a player and composer from your time with the Revolution?

Oh wow. I don’t have a favorite moment, per se. I’m just lucky I had that experience, and I’m so lucky that guy was in my life, and that we did what we did. That’s what I’m proud of: that we did something powerful that was meaningful to all of us in the Revolution, and that it moved people. And that’s more apparent than ever when looking at the audiences for this tour.

From the clips I’ve watched, it seems to me this tour has been such a joyful celebration of the music and the man. I imagine it’s provided some serious closure for you as a confidant and collaborator.

It’s been a beautiful moment. We’re trying to let this awful loss for most people just land and we wanted to be together and we dug being together and that’s been the beauty of reuniting after all these years—unfortunately due to this awful, awful situation. But it has been beautiful for us to be together again with each other and this music.

Purple Rain in particular remains such a massively important work of art as an album. Do you have a favorite contribution to that record?

We spent months in a warehouse in Minneapolis just honing his ideas. He came in with his recipe and basically said, “I need to cook this, what are we going to do?” And that whole time, we all showed up and gave just our absolute best to those recipes and, to me, everything about it was just perfection. So it’s really hard to choose a single moment.

As someone who’s spent much of her career contributing guitar parts to pop music, and also witnessed the decline of guitar use in pop over the past few decades, do you have any advice to offer players interested in applying their guitar work in unexpected places in contemporary pop music?

If I was asked to play guitar on a Katy Perry record or something these days, I’d have to tell the producer that there’s just no room for it. Unless you want big power chords, I can do that, but otherwise, there’s just no room. The way pop songs are written these days, there’s 12 people with computers sitting in a room trying to mimic the latest chart-topping track, but make it just unique enough to get a pass. It’s ridiculous.

Hip-hop is the biggest commodity there is right now, and hip-hop has a better chance for interesting guitar. Anderson Paak does a really lovely job of it, for example. It’s such a vague time right now, I really don’t know. I don’t listen to pop music for guitar work anymore. Everything comes back around, though, so who knows?

On that note, is there anything that’s really turning you on right now as a producer and player in the gear world?

Well, because our tour is skin and bones, I profiled all of my boutique amps with my Kemper Profiling amp and it’s absolutely spectacular. I’m going straight through the board and all of my boutique amps are profiled perfectly. I absolutely love my little Top Hat amps. They’re just beautiful, and I’ve got great old Silvertones, and vintage Fender White Higher Fidelity amps that I use in the studio a lot, and all of them are profiled and good to go in the Kemper. I’m a small amp girl in the studio, and I just truly believe you get better sounds that way.

Your father was a studio musician and a member of the illustrious Wrecking Crew and played on records by Sinatra and a laundry list of other greats. Was he an influence on your path into studio work?

No, my dad didn’t influence me, actually! It was more my mother. My dad was really a worker. He was one of these session dudes that was out of the house from 9 in the morning until 9 at night doing three sessions a day—what they called “triples” back in the day. My mother was this huge music fan that sat me down in front of some speakers when I was kid and opened up the sheet music to things like The Rite of Spring and said stuff like “follow the cello part,” and I did, and it just blew my mind. She was the one that forced me to start guitar, and the only way she could get me to do it was to do the first two months with me, and then I was hooked in. I was six! So it was really more her that got me involved.

As far as other direct influences go, who was important to Wendy the guitarist?

That list is absolutely endless, and veers far away from just guitarists! Bowie, obviously, and the various people he had on guitar, like Mick Ronson, who might be my all-time favorite player. When I bought Mick Ronson’s first solo record and heard that song “Only After Dark,” that’s when I realized glam is funky, and can be so funky. Listen to the tone on that song and the way he played that rhythm part and tell me that guy wasn’t a genius.

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire Review

https://www.cgmagonline.com/review/movie/ghostbusters-frozen-empire-review/

40 years ago, A group of young, established comedians from popular shows like Saturday Night Live and SCTV teamed with a Canadian Director with some cult hits under his belt and created the beginning of a franchise that has transcended film. It became a successful cartoon and a massive merchandise line, and it birthed one of pop culture’s most loyal fandoms. It has also spawned a sequel, a spinoff, and two more films that continue the story, the most recent of which, Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, could be considered a new beginning for the franchise.

Ghostbuster: Frozen Empire features the return of the core cast, including McKenna Grace (The Handmaid’s Tale, Gifted) as the brilliant teen, Phoebe Spengler, Finn Wolfhard (Stranger Things, It) as her older brother, Trevor, Carrie Coon (Gone Girl, Avengers: Infinity War) as their mother (and daughter of the late Ghostbuster, Egon), Callie, Paul Rudd (Ant-Man, Anchorman) as former science teacher turned Ghostbuster, Gary, Celeste O’Connor (Madame Web, Irreplaceable You) as Lucky and Logan Kim (The Walking Dead: Dead City) as Podcast. Added to the cast are Kumail Nanjiani (The Big Sick, Silicon Valley) as Nadeem, Patton Oswalt (Ratatouille, MODOK) as Dr. Hubert Wartzki and Emily Alyn Lind (Gossip Girl, Doctor Sleep) as Melody.

Also returning to the franchise are the OGs, namely the three surviving Ghostbusters, Dan Aykroyd, Bill Murray and Ernie Hudson, as well as Annie Potts. Also returning from the original film is character actor William Atherton (Die Hard, Real Genius) as EPA Inspector turned Mayor Walter Peck. Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire is Directed by Ghostbusters: Afterlife co-writer Gil Kenan (Monster House, Poltergeist) and is co-written by Kenan and ‘Afterlife’ Director Jason Reitman, both of whom co-produced the film. Ivan Reitman, the original film’s Director and co-producer of Ghostbusters: Afterlife, was given a producer credit despite having passed away in 2022, only a few months after the release of the previous film.

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire finds its core cast having left Oklahoma for New York, officially busting ghosts out of the iconic headquarters, Hook and Ladder 8, being bankrolled by retired Ghostbuster and Philanthropist Winston Zeddemore (Ernie Hudson). Discovery of an ancient artifact puts the world in paranormal peril, and it brings all of the Ghostbusters, old and new, together to solve the problem before it’s too late.

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire starts with a cold open (pun intended) that sets a tone that lets you know that, while this is still a Ghostbusters movie, it is going to skew a little darker. Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire does a great job riding that line to give you a scary (but not too scary) ghost picture while maintaining the comedy you expect. They also did a better job at balancing the audience, making it feel a little less of a movie for the young (despite the nostalgia) and creating a movie that can capture any audience.

What’s more, however, is that Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire is a film that has been refocused. Ghostbusters: Afterlife was very much framed as an homage to the recently passed Harold Ramis, and rightfully so, but the franchise could have ended there, and people would have understood. ‘Frozen Empire’ comes at it a little differently. While it does pay tribute to Ivan Reitman both in the credits and a fun little easter egg in the film, its focus is aimed more at laying the foundation to continue the franchise, if not expand it into its own cinematic universe. New characters, more tech and ideas laid out in the film let you know that they are looking to the future.

The actors’ performances across the board were great. They were mainly grounded within an obviously larger-than-life story. Paul Rudd leads the way with his signature comedic sensibility without going too big, Finn Wolfhard was given more opportunity to be comic relief rather than the awkward teen of the previous film and McKenna Grace, the heart of this generation of the franchise, is the MVP with a sympathetic, very real performance, even in the strangest of situations.

Patton Oswalt and Kumail Nanjiani, both self-confessed nerds, focused their love and enthusiasm for the Ghostbusters franchise into perfect supporting performances, which I hope will lead to larger roles should more sequels be greenlit. The original cast members offer more than just a journey back to your childhood, as well.

Dan Aykroyd plays a bit of a mirror to McKenna Grace’s Phoebe, with one being too old to bust ghosts and the other being too young, despite their passion. Bill Murray is Bill Murray. He is a walking home run, and Ernie Hudson’s role as de facto leader of the Ghostbusters (consistent with the lore that continued in other properties) is a fantastic turn for the man who was treated as more or less an afterthought in the original Ghostbusters.

Beyond the quality of Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire is the personal experience that comes with it. I take a little pride that two of my picks to be the new generation of Ghostbusters that I made over 10 years ago, Paul Rudd and Patton Oswalt, are in this film together (Bill Hader and Tracey Morgan were my other picks), but the theatre where I watched this film in IMAX was filled not with reviewers, but with adults in full Ghostbusters attire, including film-accurate proton packs.

This was likely a contingent of the Ontario Ghostbusters, one of many Ghostbusters costuming groups across the world whose loyalty to the film has created a wonderful community that I was thrilled to be amidst for this experience. Add to them the kids in the audience, many of whom may have been having their first Ghostbusters experience, and the shared joy between old and new viewers alike was a clear indicator of how this story has not only survived but thrived for four decades.

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire releases on March 22 in theatres everywhere and is also available on IMAX and other large format screens. I see this instalment as a true Ghostbusters 3, with Ghostbusters: Afterlife being a part 2.5, establishing the characters and backstories that get us to this latest story presented before us. It is full of nods to its history and teases for a future that I, frankly, am quite excited to see come to fruition.

Monday, July 29, 2024

Joan Of Arc Before King Charles VII Meets The Prelates Who Asks In Chinon by Gillot Saint-Evre, 1832.


Ночь рождения. Мультфильм (1980)

Кукольный мультипликационный фильм для малышей. Сказка о том, как мальчик Тима перестал бояться ночной темноты и научился спать без света. Жил-был на свете мальчик Тима. Он очень любил, чтобы было светло. Пока был день или просто горел свет, Тима играл или рисовал, но как только Тиму звали спать, он сразу вспоминал, что спят в темноте, которую он боялся. И вот однажды к нему в гости явилась Ночь и пригласила Тиму к себе на ночь рождения, а чтобы он не испугался темноты, зажгла звезды и луну…

ТО Экран 1980
Автор сценария - Александр Костинский
Режиссер - Розалия Зельма
Оператор - Евгений Туревич
Композитор - Эдуард Артемьев
Художник - Макс Жеребчевский
Текст читал - Всеволод Шиловский

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

Barbie brought more enjoyment than Blade Runner in 2023. That's wack.

A still from Blade Runner (1982), directed by Ridley Scott

Since I finally finished watching Barbie (2023), I can provide my opinion about it. This film turned out to be considerably better than I expected. When it was released in the summer of 2023 in theaters, in the same week as Oppenheimer, I had no desire to see it, and I didn't think that I would see it. Before watching Barbie, I didn't know anything about the director, Greta Gerwig, and I hadn't seen any of her other films, though I have Lady Bird (2017) and Little Women (2019) in my collection. I expected Barbie to be some bland modern film about a doll, but Gerwig managed to turn it into something more than that. I've already seen Oppenheimer, and, since Barbie is the other half of the Barbenheimer cultural phenomenon, I watched the film attentively in order to know well how good the film really is and how it compares to Oppenheimer. While Christopher Nolan probably intended Oppenheimer to be an awards winner, I don't think that Gerwig expected Barbie to win awards and to become the highest-grossing film of 2023. When it comes to entertainment value, I think that Barbie is about as entertaining as Oppenheimer. In my brief review of Oppenheimer, I pointed out that the film has poor casting, except for a few exceptions, and that it does a poor job of portraying the era in which it is set. Barbie isn't a historical film, but I found the casting to be mostly good, and I found the sets and the special effects to be surprisingly good. Nothing in Barbieland stood out to me as inappropriate or bad-looking. I particularly like the travel sequence from Barbieland to the real world. I mentioned that the cinematography of Oppenheimer is underwhelming for me, though there are some scenes that are shot well. I found the cinematography of Barbie to be more appealing, and it's especially fitting in some peculiar scenes, like when Stereotypical Barbie meets Ruth Handler at the Mattel headquarters. As a comedy, Barbie works surprisingly well. There are effective funny bits throughout the film. The film's soundtrack and score are rather good too. All in all, I think that Barbie is one of the best films from the summer of 2023, though it's not among the very best for me because I think that Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem, Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One, The Flash, Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse, and Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 3 are better films. But the fact that Gerwig was able to make a film this good based on a popular plastic doll is quite an achievement. It's not just an enjoyable fantasy comedy. It also has something to say. I won't get into what it has to say because I don't want to and because I've seen the film only once. I found Barbie to be a more solid film than Oppenheimer. I wouldn't call Barbie or Oppenheimer a masterpiece. If these films are compared to the best that cinema has to offer, they come off as average at best, but there are things that I like in both of them. This is what kind of surprised me. The two films can be described as opposites, and yet they're both kind of enjoyable to watch. This makes me think that maybe I should have seen them in theaters when they were released in July of 2023. Funnily enough, seeing Blade Runner (1982) again in a theater in the summer of last year didn't do anything for me. Since it was a screening of Blade Runner, the auditorium was full of people, but the film, which is a classic, just didn't bring me any enjoyment this time. Before the film began playing, one of the theater staff came to stand before the crowd that had gathered to see the film in the lobby and said that a screening of Blade Runner is special and that the film attracts a large audience. Well, perhaps I wasn't in the right mood or perhaps it's best to see Blade Runner alone. Blade Runner is one of those films that I've seen several times. Therefore, I know what happens in it very well. But I enjoyed watching it the most at home when I was alone and not in a packed auditorium. But the worst experience that I had in a theater last year was when I watched The Virgin Suicides (1999), which turned out to be very dull and very boring. I still can't really forgive myself for buying a ticket in order to see this film. Watching paint dry would have been just as enjoyable as watching The Virgin Suicides. I like Lost In Translation (2003), but Sofia Coppola's The Virgin Suicides, her first effort as a director, is just terrible.

What's interesting is that I recently began to read a few non-fiction books that I've already read. Robert Stawell Ball's 'The Story of the Heavens' (1886) is actually the first book that I bought in a used books store. This happened several years ago. But I still haven't finished reading this book because I've been reading plenty of other books and magazines too. I've already read a large portion of Ball's book, and, when I do read it, I enjoy reading it quite a lot. Since I recently got to the chapter about Mars, I will include a little of what Ball had to say about Mars. "Although many valuable observations of Mars were made in the course of the nineteenth century, it is only since the very favourable opposition of 1877 that the study of the surface of Mars has made that immense progress which is one of the most remarkable features of modern astronomy. Among the observers who produced valuable drawings of the planet in 1877 we may mention Mr. Green, whose exquisite pictures were published by the Royal Astronomical Society, and Professor Schiaparelli, of Milan, who almost revolutionised our knowledge of this planet. Schiaparelli had a refractor of only eight inches aperture at his disposal, but he was doubtless much favoured by the purity of the Italian sky, which enabled him to detect in the bright portions of the surface of Mars a considerable number of long, narrow lines. To these he gave the name of "canals," inasmuch as they issued from the so-called oceans, and could be traced across the reputed continents for considerable distances, which sometimes reached thousands of miles. The canals seemed to form a kind of network, which connected the various seas with each other. A few of the more conspicuous of these so-called canals appeared indeed on some of the drawings made by Dawes and others before Schiaparelli's time. It was, however, the illustrious Italian astronomer who detected that these narrow lines are present in such great numbers as to form a notable feature of the planet. Great as had been the surprise of astronomers when Schiaparelli first proclaimed the discovery of these numerous canals, it was, perhaps, surpassed by the astonishment with which his announcement was received in 1882 that most of the canals had become double. Between December, 1881, and February, 1882, thirty of these duplications appear to have taken place. Nineteen of these were cases of a well-traced parallel line being formed near a previously existing canal." I bought 'A History of Science, and its Relations with Philosophy and Religion' (1929) by William Cecil Dampier in the same store and at the same time as Ball's book. I finished reading Dampier's book quite quickly, but I began to read it again recently because it's one of those books that I enjoyed reading the most. The following citation is some of what Dampier had to say about the development of science in Ancient India. "Since little is yet known about the claims that have been made for a very early development of science in China, the only other country in the ancient world which we need consider is India. It is difficult to trace much scientific activity there before the time of Alexander. But in ethical philosophy the name of Buddha (560-480 B.C.) is of course pre-eminent, and schools of medicine existed at the same early date. In the time of Buddha himself, according to tradition, Atreya, the physician, taught at Kasi or Benares, and Susruta, the surgeon, at Taksasila, or Taxila. The work of the latter, at all events, seems to be historical, and a Sanscrit text of it is extant, though the date is uncertain to within a century. A number of operations are described, such as those for cataract and hernia; some account is given of anatomy, physiology and pathology, and over 700 medicinal plants are noted. The memory of Atreya was preserved by Caraka of Cashmir, who, about A.D. 150, wrote a compendium of Atreya's system of medicine, as handed down by his pupil Agnivesa. Perhaps the paucity of Indian contribution to other sciences may in part be due to the Hindu religion. Buddha founded his system on love and knowledge, and a respect for reason and truth; but these tenets, favourable to science as they might have been, were neutralized by the other components of his philosophy. The transitoriness and vanity of personal existence were emphasized; self-annihilation and loss of individuality were made the condition upon which the attainment of spiritual completion depended. This attitude of mind, by distracting attention from all immediate surroundings, tends to arrest the desire for material improvement, which is often the incentive leading to an advance in practical scientific knowledge. But the gentle art of healing was consistent with the Buddhist religion, and for this reason, perhaps, the works of Atreya and Susruta with their stores of medical and surgical learning have survived. In one point the Buddhist philosophy of India touched a problem definitely scientific. A primitive atomic theory was formulated, either independently or by derivation from Greek thought, and about the first or second century before Christ the idea of discontinuity was extended to time. Indian arithmetic is remarkable, in that there is evidence to show that as early as the third century B.C. a system of notation was used from which was developed the scheme of numerals we employ to-day. It is possible that Indian thought influenced the schools of Asia Minor, and through them those of Greece; and it is certain that, at a later time, during the Arab domination in the lands of the Eastern Mediterranean, traces of the mathematics and medicine of India mingled with the learning saved from Greece and Rome, and re-entered the schools of Western Europe by way of Spain and Constantinople. This explains the fact that, when the Indian scheme of notation replaced the clumsy Roman figures, the primary source of the numerals was forgotten and they were misnamed Arabic. All the separate streams of knowledge in the ancient world converged on Greece, there to be filtered and purified, and turned into new and more profitable channels by the marvelous genius of the race which was the first in Europe to emerge from obscurity." The other books that I've been reading again slowly are Carroll Quigley's 'The Evolution of Civilizations: An Introduction to Historical Analysis' (1961) and 'Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time' (1966). Although just about everything that Quigley has to say in his books is interesting, I found the chapter about the collapse of China to 1920 to be most interesting this time. The following is a little of what he had to say. "Respect for old traditions, for the accepted modes of thought and action, for the ancestors in society and religion, and for the father in the family became the salient characteristics of Chinese society. That this society was a complex network of vested interests, was unprogressive, and was shot through with corruption was no more objectionable to the average Chinese, on any level, than the fact that it was also shot through with inefficiency. These things became objectionable only when Chinese society came directly in contact with European culture during the nineteenth century. As these two societies collided, inefficiency, unprogressiveness, corruption, and the whole nexus of vested interests and traditions which constituted Chinese society was unable to survive in contact with the efficiency, the progressiveness, and the instruments of penetration and domination of Europeans. A system could not hope to survive which could not provide itself with firearms in large quantities or with mass armies of loyal soldiers to use such weapons, a system which could not increase its taxes or its output of wealth or which could not keep track of its own population or its own incomes by effective records or which had no effective methods of communication and transportation over an area of 3.5 million square miles. The society of the West which began to impinge on China about 1800 was powerful, efficient, and progressive. It had no respect for the corruption, the traditions, the property rights, the family solidarity, or the ethical moderation of traditional Chinese society. As the weapons of the West, along with its efficient methods of sanitation, of writing, of transportation and communications, of individual self-interest, and of corrosive intellectual rationalism came into contact with Chinese society, they began to dissolve it. On the one hand, Chinese society was too weak to defend itself against the West. When it tried to do so, as in the Opium Wars and other struggles of 1841-1861, or in the Boxer uprising of 1900, such Chinese resistance to European penetration was crushed by the armaments of the Western Powers, and all kinds of concessions to these Powers were imposed on China. The political impact of Western civilization on China, great as it was, was overshadowed by the economic impact. We have already indicated that China was a largely agrarian country. Years of cultivation and the slow growth of population had given rise to a relentless pressure on the soil and to a destructive exploitation of its vegetative resources. Most of the country was deforested, resulting in shortage of fuel, rapid runoff of precipitation, constant danger of floods, and large-scale erosion of the soil. The fact that the southern portion of the country depended on rice cultivation created many problems, since this crop, of relatively low nutritive value, required great expenditure of labor (transplanting and weeding) under conditions which were destructive to good health. Long periods of wading in rice paddies exposed most peasants to various kinds of joint diseases, and to water-borne infections such as malaria or parasitical flukes. The pressure on the soil was intensified by the fact that 60 percent of China was over 6,000 feet above sea level, too high for cultivation, while more than half the land had inadequate rainfall (below twenty inches a year). Moreover, the rainfall was provided by the erratic monsoon winds which frequently brought floods and occasionally failed completely, causing wholesale famine. In the United States 140 million people were supported by the labor of 6.5 million farmers on 365 million acres of cultivated land in 1945; China, about the same time, had almost 500 million persons supported by the labor of 65 million farmers on only 217 million acres of cultivated land. As a consequence of this pressure on the land, the average Chinese peasant had, even in earlier times, no margin above the subsistence level, especially when we recall that a certain part of this income flowed upward to the upper classes. In America the farmer could afford to spend large sums for farm machinery because the labor such machinery replaced would have been expensive anyway and because the cost of the machinery was spread over such a large acreage that its cost per acre was relatively moderate. In Asia there was no capital for such expenditures on machinery because there was no margin of surplus above subsistence in the hands of the peasantry and because the average farm was so small that the cost of machinery per acre (either to buy or even to operate) would have been prohibitive. Because of the relatively low productivity of Chinese (and all Asiatic) agriculture, the whole population was close to the margin of subsistence and, at irregular intervals, was forced below that margin into widespread famine. In China the situation was alleviated to some extent by three forces. In the first place, the irregular famines which we have mentioned, and somewhat more frequent onslaughts of plague disease, kept the population within manageable bounds. These two irregular occurrences reduced the population by millions, in both China and India, when they occurred."

Now reading Time magazine Vol. 107 No. 12: American Chic In Fashion (March 22, 1976)...


Wednesday, July 17, 2024

West Side Highway Selux

https://www.selux.us/usa/en/cases/west-side-highway

 The West Side Highway (officially the Joe DiMaggio Highway) is a mostly surface section of New York State Route 9A (NY 9A) that runs from West 72nd Street along the Hudson River to the southern tip of Manhattan in New York City. It replaced the West Side Elevated Highway, built between 1929 and 1951, which was shut down in 1973 due to neglect and lack of maintenance, and was dismantled by 1989. The current highway was complete by 2001, but required some reconstruction due to damage sustained in the 9/11 attacks. It uses the surface streets that existed before the elevated highway was built. Thousands of tourists, joggers, bikers, and commuters travel the West Side Highway every day.

Selux Corral Columns and Bollards were installed at the West Side Highway, located across from the Jacob Javitz Convention Center on the downtown New York riverside. The columns gracefully illuminate the terminal as well as riverwalk attractions.












A Halo Series Retrospective

Halo is a series full of people's happiest memories and moments. So in preparation for Halo Infinite let's go through the Halo Series to see how the games hold up. Welcome to the Halo Series Retrospective
_________________________________________________
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
2:21 Halo CE
15:25 Halo 2
28:57 Halo 3
48:41 Halo ODST
59:37 Halo Reach
1:17:18 Halo 4
1:31:43 Halo 5
1:47:27 Outro

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Now listening to Better Off Dead by various artists and Loverboy by Loverboy...



On Granville Street in Downtown Vancouver. Summer of 2018.

Granville Street is a major street in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and part of Highway 99. Granville Street is most often associated with the Granville Entertainment District and the Granville Mall. This street also cuts through suburban neighborhoods like Shaughnessy, and Marpole via the Granville Street Bridge.

The community was known as "Gastown" (Gassy's Town) after its first citizen - Jack Deighton, known as "Gassy" Jack. "To gas" is period English slang for "to boast and to exaggerate". In 1870 the community was laid out as the "township of Granville" but everybody called it Gastown. The name Granville honours Granville Leveson-Gower, 2nd Earl Granville, who was British Secretary of State for the Colonies at the time of local settlement.

In 1886 it was incorporated as the city of Vancouver, named after Captain George Vancouver, who accompanied James Cook on his voyage to the West Coast and subsequently spent 2 years exploring and charting the West Coast.

During the 1950s, Granville Street attracted many tourists to one of the world's largest displays of neon signs.

Towards the middle of the twentieth century, the Downtown portion of Granville Street had become a flourishing centre for entertainment, known for its cinemas (built along the "Theatre Row," from the Granville Bridge to where Granville Street intersects Robson Street), restaurants, clubs, the Vogue and Orpheum theatres, and, later, arcades, pizza parlours, pawn stores, pornography shops and strip clubs.

By the late 1990s, Granville Street suffered gradual deterioration and many movie theatres, such as "The Plaza, Caprice, Paradise, [and] Granville Centre [...] have all closed for good," writes Dmitrios Otis in his article "The Last Peep Show." In the early 2000s, the news of the upcoming 2010 Winter Olympic Games, to be hosted in Whistler, a series of gentrification projects, still undergoing as of 2006, had caused the shutdown of many more businesses that had heretofore become landmarks of the street and of the city.

Also, Otis writes that "once dominated by movie theatres, pinball arcades, and sex shops [Downtown Granville is being replaced] by nightclubs and bars, as [...it] transforms into a booze-based 'Entertainment District'." In April 2005, Capitol 6, a beloved 1920s-era movie theatre complex (built in 1921 and restored and reopened in 1977) closed its doors (Chapman). By August 2005, Movieland Arcade, located at 906 Granville Street became "the last home of authentic, 8 mm 'peep show' film booths in the world" (Otis). On July 7, 2005, the Granville Book Company, a popular and independently owned bookstore was forced to close (Tupper) due to the rising rents and regulations the city began imposing in the early 2000s in order to "clean up" the street by the 2010 Olympics and combat Vancouver's "No Fun City" image. (Note the "Fun City" red banners put up by the city on the lamp-posts in the pizza-shop photograph). Landlords have been unable to find replacement tenants for many of these closed locations; for example, the Granville Book Company site was still boarded up and vacant as of July 12, 2006.

While proponents of the Granville gentrification project in general (and the 2010 Olympics in specific) claim that the improvements made to the street will only benefit its residents, the customers frequenting the clubs and the remaining theatres and cinemas, maintain that the project is a temporary solution, since the closing down of the less "classy" businesses, and the build-up of Yaletown-style condominiums in their place, will not eliminate the unwanted pizzerias, corner-stores and pornography shops - and their patrons - but will simply displace them elsewhere (an issue reminiscent of the city's long-standing inability to solve the problems of the DTES).